This isn’t a newsstand. We’ll be giving the racist antiracist ‘progressives’ of the New Yorker a piece of our minds when they publish their illiberal bullshit here.
"Context not mentioned: the man made to feel like a ‘slave’ is a convicted murderer who shot someone in the head 😆. This sort of lying by omission is absolutely central to the mainstream-lib narrative around race, the criminal justice system, and society more broadly. And it really worked for a long time (though now at long last I think their position is starting to crumble, at least slightly)."
Nobody is forcing the New Yorker to hire racists and Jew-hating staff, and we’re here to remind them that normal people aren’t aligned with their sociopathic politics. We’ve seen the racism of “antiracists™️” and the terrorism support of “Just antizionists for the genocide of Israeli Jews”. The New Yorker is staffed by moral midgets.
Why can’t we all just get along??? Why all this “anti-racist, anti-zionist, anti-everything”? Can we let this talk go and just remark on a beautiful sunset or the roses or even a good plate of spaghetti? I mean—life is too short for this anti-shit??
I know that's how progressives live, how they reinforce their little dogma-policed bubbles. But that's not what normal people do, sorry to bring you up to speed on the real world, Bridget.
I block Russian/Chinese/Iranian troll bots. I block people who are deranged Jew-hating freaks that bubble up from the internets. The rest? I engage them in conversations. The illiberal, racist, Jew-haters infesting the New Yorker get to hear from the rest of us that they're scum, and their product is propaganda trash.
Some people like The New Yorker. Considering that there are actual Nazi accounts on Substack, I think someone who gets apoplectic over the presence of The New Yorker sounds like a dicey character.
I think this is a form of advertising for them. They will publish one of their pieces to be read for free each week, and their hope is that some people will like what they read enough to decide to subscribe to the magazine. Their Substack account doesn’t have a paid subscription option — it’s free only.
Exactly. How can people who’ve been here for more than 30 seconds not get that? I like the New Yorker, I like Nick Offerman, but they are so not needed here, as they are everywhere fucking else.
I can hear the disdain dripping from this article ." Oh look at the tubes on substack having fun ! We should join and tell them why they're all wrong !", said Karen feverishly typing from the cafe whilst being paid 10¢ per word for the editor . We really would just like to be left to our own devices . I swear you people are like locusts that just show up when no one ever invited you
I find the New Yorker to be well written and open minded. These mean spirited posts are a total waste of time. If you don't like this magazine, just leave.
I'm finding the vast reaches and robotic anonymity of Substack to be worse for me than the New Yorker ever was. But even here, I can stumble upon nuggets, as this from the husband of the mentor of the pundit recommended by the former UN ambassador from Canada, whose grandkids my daughter babysat for a couple years.
Wiki says:
'[George] Steiner received criticism and support for his views that racism is inherent in everyone and that tolerance is only skin deep. He is reported to have said: "It's very easy to sit here, in this room, and say 'racism is horrible'. But ask me the same thing if a Jamaican family moved next door with six children and they play reggae and rock music all day."'
As for me? I could handle that all-day reggae music just fine. (Not saying that I have no capacity to be racist like all the rest of us. But I'm particularly fond of Three Little Birds, among other things.)
Oh stop, damn it! Can you people please behave yourselves? Don’t like The New Yorker because it’s too ritzy, too snobby, too many words about something you know nothing about, is written at a higher grade level than yours, you’re too good smart sophisticated to force yourself to read it?
Then don’t. Just move on to another article. Another issue. Another surprising turn of events.
Do you realize that “The New Yorker” magazine and the “New York Times” newspaper, which contains a magazine section, are two different things? There is also “New York Magazine”, another separate publication.
It’s a big city, with lots of different media.
I am thrilled that they are here since I can’t afford a subscription and my library doesn’t carry it anymore.
This is why I don’t do these stupid social media things. Because of idiots like Bossa Nogi. Do I need my enjoyable evening at home distracted with moronic nonsense like that? Time to read a book.
can you please STF up now? go have a 2-litre mountaindew and a few Arbinators® and give us a good burp to respond to… you know, something worth dissecting for salient points
Long time former subscriber here. Will never ever give your rag another dime. Sick to death of your narrative shaping. Sick to death of your snobbery. Sick to death of seeing a once great publication become boring and predictable propaganda.
Just so I’m clear, you think that the magazine whose mascot since issue #1 is Eustace Tilley, a dandy aristocrat in a top hat peering at a butterfly through a monocle, recently became snobbish?
It recently became racist, anti-American, illiberal, antisemitic, and other lovely qualities that characterize "kind, thoughtful progressives". But you're right, there's a strong overlap there with elite retards.
For sure. I guess snobbery always involved racism, but what's lovely about the New Yorker is that it's managed to retain a 100 year dislike of Jews. Now that's high class.
Then just go. If you're so sick of it, why are you even here announcing to the world making a big stink about it? Get on with your life. Don't you have anything better to do with your time?
The New Yorker stepping onto Substack says more about the state of modern writing than any long report could. Legacy platforms used to rely on name recognition. That advantage is gone. Readers don’t wait for prestige to tell them what’s worth reading. They follow the voice that hits them in the gut. They follow writers who speak to them without filters. Substack didn’t rise because it was new. It rose because it returned writing to a simple idea: the writer stands alone, and the reader decides if the voice matters. No walls. No layers. No distance. So The New Yorker joining this space isn’t just a move. It’s an admission. They see what every independent writer already understands. Influence is earned in real time now. Not with history. Not with reputation. With clarity, presence, and conviction. If they want to thrive here, they’ll have to compete the same way the rest of us do. Page by page. Word by word. Voice against voice. Substack rewards authenticity, not tradition. And that is the test that no legacy brand can avoid.
The mouth reaching knuckle draggers who are too busy swearing and releasing f-bomb rants do not have the intellect and maturity required to appreciate The New Yorker.
Readers are required to be very literate, be capable of critical thinking.
“To be fair, you have to have a very high IQ to understand The New Yorker. The humor is extremely subtle, and without a solid grasp of postmodern literary theory most of the jokes will go over a typical reader’s head. There’s also the magazine’s detached irony, which is deftly woven into its editorial voice - its personal philosophy draws heavily from Narodnaya Volya literature, for instance. The subscribers understand this stuff; they have the intellectual capacity to truly appreciate the depths of these cartoons, to realize that they’re not just funny- they say something deep about LIFE. As a consequence people who dislike The New Yorker truly ARE idiots- of course they wouldn’t appreciate, for instance, the humour in the existential caption “I’d like to add you to my professional network on LinkedIn,” which itself is a cryptic reference to Turgenev’s Russian epic Fathers and Sons. I’m smirking right now just imagining one of those addlepated simpletons scratching their heads in confusion as David Remnick’s genius unfolds itself on their coffee tables. What fools… how I pity them. 😂 And yes by the way, I DO have an Eustace Tilley tattoo. And no, you cannot see it. It’s for the ladies’ eyes only- And even they have to demonstrate that they’re within 5 IQ points of my own (preferably lower) beforehand.“
Oh FUCK OFF please
Jeez, you got a problem with The New Yorker? What gives?
Kind of weird isn’t it? It’s like someone says “I’m going to give you a free Belgian chocolate every week” and you tell them “Fuck off.”
They’re offering a free shit sandwich. I wouldn’t pay for the New Yorker and making it free doesn’t make it better.
Then don't subscribe, right? The New Yorker won't automatically take over your feed if you want to ignore them. (unlike other platforms)
This isn’t a newsstand. We’ll be giving the racist antiracist ‘progressives’ of the New Yorker a piece of our minds when they publish their illiberal bullshit here.
You go right ahead, and thank you for doing so.
Honestly I wish you’d go back to FB or Twitter or wherever you anger takes you.
You could read the stories instead of just the tweets distorting them https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2025/12/01/disappeared-to-a-foreign-prison
LOL. You should read how much of a gaping propaganda hole the New Yorker is https://substack.com/@maxthinks/note/c-181090809
"Context not mentioned: the man made to feel like a ‘slave’ is a convicted murderer who shot someone in the head 😆. This sort of lying by omission is absolutely central to the mainstream-lib narrative around race, the criminal justice system, and society more broadly. And it really worked for a long time (though now at long last I think their position is starting to crumble, at least slightly)."
You're funny. Start a magazine
No one is forcing you to read The New Yorker, right? If you don't like it, just go somewhere else, ok??
Fuck off. They landed here. The commentariat was here first. Fuck em.
Nobody is forcing the New Yorker to hire racists and Jew-hating staff, and we’re here to remind them that normal people aren’t aligned with their sociopathic politics. We’ve seen the racism of “antiracists™️” and the terrorism support of “Just antizionists for the genocide of Israeli Jews”. The New Yorker is staffed by moral midgets.
Such anger is not good for your soul. Take a deep breath and listen to some jazz.
Why can’t we all just get along??? Why all this “anti-racist, anti-zionist, anti-everything”? Can we let this talk go and just remark on a beautiful sunset or the roses or even a good plate of spaghetti? I mean—life is too short for this anti-shit??
You don’t have to read it and probably aren’t capable of reading much anyway, so don’t worry about it.
Fuck off. Your ad hominem attacks are what people expect from "individuals" who like the New Yorker
Yeah, that’s me, Mr Not Capable of Reading Idiotic Far-Left Propaganda.
Then block them.
How hard is it to figure that out?
If he is Jewish and they are anti semitic, even Jew hating, why should he not attack back? What’s it to you?
There are tons of antisemites in this country.
If you want to go protest outside of Turning Point USA, I'll be happy to join you. Most days you can find them in the Trump administration.
The New Yorker isn't.
MAGA is pro Israel and antisemitic.
And just like a lot of Catholics are discovering, MAGA will revert back to their traditional hatreds in a flash.
I know that's how progressives live, how they reinforce their little dogma-policed bubbles. But that's not what normal people do, sorry to bring you up to speed on the real world, Bridget.
I block Russian/Chinese/Iranian troll bots. I block people who are deranged Jew-hating freaks that bubble up from the internets. The rest? I engage them in conversations. The illiberal, racist, Jew-haters infesting the New Yorker get to hear from the rest of us that they're scum, and their product is propaganda trash.
https://www.theradicalist.com/p/every-racist-writer-at-the-new-yorker
You think I'm a progressive?
DYD.
You're not engaging anyone in conversation. You're attacking and screaming and pretty much sounding like a spoiled five year old.
You don't like the New Yorker? Big deal.
You want to claim they're responsible for the death of civilization?
Call your doctor and schedule a mental health appointment.
Really, talk to someone. In the real world.
Because your grip on reality is slipping.
But Belgium chocolate is good.
Some people like The New Yorker. Considering that there are actual Nazi accounts on Substack, I think someone who gets apoplectic over the presence of The New Yorker sounds like a dicey character.
Caitlin Johnston is a nazi, yes. The new Yorker is rich people bullhit that everyone shares. It's easy to ignore nazis like Caitlin Johnston. https://open.substack.com/pub/marlowe1/p/the-witching-snakes-10-12?utm_source=share&utm_medium=android&shareImageVariant=overlay&r=sllf3
Indeed
I think this is a form of advertising for them. They will publish one of their pieces to be read for free each week, and their hope is that some people will like what they read enough to decide to subscribe to the magazine. Their Substack account doesn’t have a paid subscription option — it’s free only.
That's one hell of a pro-regime biog you have, Benjamin
?
How do you restack comments
There are quite a few bugs in substack software and naturally many user errors too.
There may be a few options. One way to attempt to move your comment from one spot to another preferred spot is to:
copy the text;
paste the text where you prefer;
hope for the best;
then delete whichever result you don’t want.
He’s a far right Zionist. As you can see, the hornets have followed. Yes. It’s bizarre.
Not to mention the neo-fascists in the crowd. Quite a mix. Perhaps it’s a troll farm.
Yeah they suckass. Dumb little lickspits for the fucking bosses, like the bosses need the fucking help
Geez people need to read the article.
Then simply choose to read the weekly articles or not
It’s not The New Yorker. It’s the New Yorker in the context of Substack.
Exactly. How can people who’ve been here for more than 30 seconds not get that? I like the New Yorker, I like Nick Offerman, but they are so not needed here, as they are everywhere fucking else.
Oh fuck off please is scintillating. Y'all need to publish this guy.
Who are you referring to?
I can hear the disdain dripping from this article ." Oh look at the tubes on substack having fun ! We should join and tell them why they're all wrong !", said Karen feverishly typing from the cafe whilst being paid 10¢ per word for the editor . We really would just like to be left to our own devices . I swear you people are like locusts that just show up when no one ever invited you
Feeling the same about you, bub.
Well , bless your heart ! Thanks at least someone cares about me on here
Oh no! Whatever shall I do ? Some retard that I don't know & can't even spell correctly is trying to tell me how I should be & feel.
Go sit the fuck down , & shut up for a bit. Retard
This u? Y can't u spell either?
You know, you don't have to subscribe, you don't have to comment, go live your life and don't worry about the New Yorker. No one will be upset.
I find the New Yorker to be well written and open minded. These mean spirited posts are a total waste of time. If you don't like this magazine, just leave.
I suspect they’ve never been able to an entire article in the New Yorker. Please list one or two articles that prove your point.
I'm finding the vast reaches and robotic anonymity of Substack to be worse for me than the New Yorker ever was. But even here, I can stumble upon nuggets, as this from the husband of the mentor of the pundit recommended by the former UN ambassador from Canada, whose grandkids my daughter babysat for a couple years.
Wiki says:
'[George] Steiner received criticism and support for his views that racism is inherent in everyone and that tolerance is only skin deep. He is reported to have said: "It's very easy to sit here, in this room, and say 'racism is horrible'. But ask me the same thing if a Jamaican family moved next door with six children and they play reggae and rock music all day."'
As for me? I could handle that all-day reggae music just fine. (Not saying that I have no capacity to be racist like all the rest of us. But I'm particularly fond of Three Little Birds, among other things.)
Attention seeking nonsense. Nothing to see here… 🙄
Oh stop, damn it! Can you people please behave yourselves? Don’t like The New Yorker because it’s too ritzy, too snobby, too many words about something you know nothing about, is written at a higher grade level than yours, you’re too good smart sophisticated to force yourself to read it?
Then don’t. Just move on to another article. Another issue. Another surprising turn of events.
I snorted at that.
Same.
What, no one pane comics with those articles?
I love this offer. Thank you. I think I’ll skip the comments section however. (-:
It’s kinda NYC punk in a counterintuitive
Do you realize that “The New Yorker” magazine and the “New York Times” newspaper, which contains a magazine section, are two different things? There is also “New York Magazine”, another separate publication.
It’s a big city, with lots of different media.
I am thrilled that they are here since I can’t afford a subscription and my library doesn’t carry it anymore.
This is why I don’t do these stupid social media things. Because of idiots like Bossa Nogi. Do I need my enjoyable evening at home distracted with moronic nonsense like that? Time to read a book.
can you please STF up now? go have a 2-litre mountaindew and a few Arbinators® and give us a good burp to respond to… you know, something worth dissecting for salient points
😂
We’re a bunch of racists, sexists, and misogynists here. You may not like it here.🤗
Noob.
You are maybe
Attention seeking nonsense. Nothing to see here… 🙄
Or they could block them the way the rest of us do.
Irony, perhaps, Alex Jean?
Long time former subscriber here. Will never ever give your rag another dime. Sick to death of your narrative shaping. Sick to death of your snobbery. Sick to death of seeing a once great publication become boring and predictable propaganda.
Just so I’m clear, you think that the magazine whose mascot since issue #1 is Eustace Tilley, a dandy aristocrat in a top hat peering at a butterfly through a monocle, recently became snobbish?
It recently became racist, anti-American, illiberal, antisemitic, and other lovely qualities that characterize "kind, thoughtful progressives". But you're right, there's a strong overlap there with elite retards.
I don't agree with progressive identity politics at all but snobbery has been its defining brand from day one
For sure. I guess snobbery always involved racism, but what's lovely about the New Yorker is that it's managed to retain a 100 year dislike of Jews. Now that's high class.
Brilliant Tony!!😄
this
Then just go. If you're so sick of it, why are you even here announcing to the world making a big stink about it? Get on with your life. Don't you have anything better to do with your time?
Will you publish any fiction? It’d be nice to get fiction doing better on Substack.
Most of their political articles are fiction
🙌🙌🙌
agreed
there’s a ton of fiction on substack and you don’t need the new yorker to pick it out for you
Well, this certainly brought the trolls out of their slumber!!!
What 'trolls'? These are humans, creep
Yes, humans on troll farms in Nigeria like you 'Craig'.
Why Nigeria? You dumb ugly whore
Trolls pretending to be humanoid
Haha, bist du blöd😂
Noob
I feel so sorry for the intern who wrote this.
Nah. It's good to have your eyes opened early.
How many bots can you now pay to create the impression that anyone gives a shit?
A flood of them have arrived the last day or two, as you can clearly see from the crap they're typing
Should we call it a “mixed reception” thus far?
Noob.
I think this one needs a blender.
Your rag is insufficient for ass wiping, but boy did I give it the college try.
So you felt the need to tell everyone you can't wipe your own ass successfully?
Okey dokey.
never tried but i think it was sarcasm, no? you must be a fan of tny..
but i bet no one could effectively wipe said region well because the paper….
You need to check in with the oldest person you know.
.
Rural people were still using newspapers and the Sears catalog in outhouses when I was a kid.
Rural Irish people were using something that looked like wax paper.
😁
So, yes, a paper magazine can be used.
Jake, of course, may be trying to wipe his ass with his phone but that's a bigger problem.
😁😁😁
Not what he said, though, is it?
If Libs were going to send a flood of drones to assail the comments section, two weeks ago was the time to do it.
All of them arriving within the last two days, & the content they're posting, just looks ridiculously obvious & co-ordinated
Oh Craig, liberals have lives.
Not everyone has the time to read everything every day.
Again, we have lives.
Some of us read it when it pops up in our feed.
And then some of us are so amused by you whiny little twerps that we comment.
And while you weren't the whiniest, you're certainly trying hard.
When you blame a magazine because you can't wipe your own ass, you can't be surprised that you sound like a fool.
When you claim everyone has to read everything right away, you sound like a fool.
🤡🤡🤡
You're promoting all these Soros Scum - Kinzuger, Don Knight, all the full-time regime scumfuckers.
Your ‘opinion’ is bought & paid for, and doesn't count.
Why did you feel the need to distort his comment anyway, and what did you achieve by doing so?
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
You are projecting again, Craig.
Every accusation is a confession.
So how much do you get paid?
Because I do this because I love my country and I despise this regime.
Oh and because it's fun to point out the stupidity of MAGA responses.
Which country do you live in again?
You're clearly on the Hungarian oligarch's payroll. The overkill of Laugh Emojis is a dead giveaway
Dur.
Nobody cares.
Here to balance out the comments with love for The New Yorker. Thank you for elevating great writing - looking forward to this!
I’ve been here for 100 years worth of platform updates.
lol. Yes. This.
LOL
The New Yorker stepping onto Substack says more about the state of modern writing than any long report could. Legacy platforms used to rely on name recognition. That advantage is gone. Readers don’t wait for prestige to tell them what’s worth reading. They follow the voice that hits them in the gut. They follow writers who speak to them without filters. Substack didn’t rise because it was new. It rose because it returned writing to a simple idea: the writer stands alone, and the reader decides if the voice matters. No walls. No layers. No distance. So The New Yorker joining this space isn’t just a move. It’s an admission. They see what every independent writer already understands. Influence is earned in real time now. Not with history. Not with reputation. With clarity, presence, and conviction. If they want to thrive here, they’ll have to compete the same way the rest of us do. Page by page. Word by word. Voice against voice. Substack rewards authenticity, not tradition. And that is the test that no legacy brand can avoid.
The mouth reaching knuckle draggers who are too busy swearing and releasing f-bomb rants do not have the intellect and maturity required to appreciate The New Yorker.
Readers are required to be very literate, be capable of critical thinking.
There is a place in Substack for everyone.
Is that the extent of your vocabulary?
“To be fair, you have to have a very high IQ to understand The New Yorker. The humor is extremely subtle, and without a solid grasp of postmodern literary theory most of the jokes will go over a typical reader’s head. There’s also the magazine’s detached irony, which is deftly woven into its editorial voice - its personal philosophy draws heavily from Narodnaya Volya literature, for instance. The subscribers understand this stuff; they have the intellectual capacity to truly appreciate the depths of these cartoons, to realize that they’re not just funny- they say something deep about LIFE. As a consequence people who dislike The New Yorker truly ARE idiots- of course they wouldn’t appreciate, for instance, the humour in the existential caption “I’d like to add you to my professional network on LinkedIn,” which itself is a cryptic reference to Turgenev’s Russian epic Fathers and Sons. I’m smirking right now just imagining one of those addlepated simpletons scratching their heads in confusion as David Remnick’s genius unfolds itself on their coffee tables. What fools… how I pity them. 😂 And yes by the way, I DO have an Eustace Tilley tattoo. And no, you cannot see it. It’s for the ladies’ eyes only- And even they have to demonstrate that they’re within 5 IQ points of my own (preferably lower) beforehand.“
That kind of attitude is why your crew keep losing elections, hearts, minds & eventually your whole empire
Love this- nailed it.
🤗
So how would you spell my name?
Joorgen?
It would no doubt be toö toö much to handle.
Noob.
Who could want this?
Noob.
Oh yay, the antiracism publication that purged itself of white writers is here to spread the gospel of Free Palestine to the unwashed masses.
Substack doesn’t need Important Works guided by the hand of “Jew for the genocide of Israeli Jews” David Remnick. Thanks, no thanks, do fuck off.
I’m really hoping the New Yorker will recommend me while I’m still bigger than them.
Will recommend back.
That's the kind of community participation I'm talking about!
Haven’t heard from them yet, continuing a theme that began with a Shoute & Murmurs submission in 1999.
Noob.